From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LFFdy-000458-Ro for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:22:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19C5FE08C0; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:21:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp03.tky.fi (smtp03.tky.fi [82.130.63.73]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4D2FE08C0 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.209] ([82.130.46.209]) by smtp03.tky.fi (SMSSMTP 4.1.9.35) with SMTP id M2008122400214023035 for ; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:21:40 +0200 Message-ID: <49516479.5040506@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:21:45 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081129) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: what happened to /etc/init.d/hal{d,daemon,whatever} script ? References: <494F1518.2020109@avtomatika.com> <495079D0.5060704@avtomatika.com> <4950FA78.3080602@gentoo.org> <49514C99.5020602@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <49514C99.5020602@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA51014C5961CC2F73AF5A0C3" X-Archives-Salt: 2de1e1a7-4a0f-410b-b121-76cc148110f8 X-Archives-Hash: a8c1658c981963cec4e17f14600a64df This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA51014C5961CC2F73AF5A0C3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Doug Goldstein wrote: > Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: >> Branko Badrljica wrote: >> =20 >>> Since I might not be the only tinkerer on Gentoo to try stuff like th= at >>> and since it took me a day to find this, maybe it wouldn't hurt to ch= eck >>> for this kind of thing in portage ? >>> At the very least failed cp should stop emerge... >>> >>> >>> =20 >> >> Well there isn't a single place to add die statements. The important >> thing is for ebuild developers to remember to add || die to all stuff >> that could potentially fail. If you find the cp in question that faile= d >> for you, the right place to file bugs is https://bugs.gentoo.org. >> >> Regards, >> Petteri >> >> =20 > Looks like people have been truly over-zealous when removing "die" > statements from ebuilds lately. I've added back to HAL an assortment of= > "die" statements. >=20 > I hope this hasn't happened in too many other ebuilds. >=20 Who has been removing die statements? Is this a suggested way of action somewhere by someone? Regards, Petteri --------------enigA51014C5961CC2F73AF5A0C3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklRZHoACgkQcxLzpIGCsLSxogCffJAhJ1ldxr9Gb2kETZphr4I8 ycEAnApbOCnwoCbpHZq1W05VxRUeyp42 =CtHG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA51014C5961CC2F73AF5A0C3--