From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L9reZ-00054r-6l for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:44:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D17EAE04E8; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 01:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6104E04E8 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 01:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.28.2.137] (bl8-213-56.dsl.telepac.pt [85.241.213.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DA0651BE for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 01:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <493DCD87.6040400@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:44:39 -0100 From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081123) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 policy for portage tree References: <493DB50A.8090403@jmhengen.net> <1228781390.7351.2.camel@TesterTop3.tester.ca> <20081209001123.16281209@snowmobile> <1228782344.7351.5.camel@TesterTop3.tester.ca> <20081209002909.291758a0@snowmobile> In-Reply-To: <20081209002909.291758a0@snowmobile> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 161aba60-e483-4ad0-a8a2-9484cbe10835 X-Archives-Hash: 7b901bd4ecdb3ad8bcc337af3092c99b -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:25:44 -0500 > Olivier Cr=C3=AAte wrote: >>> The "can be tested properly" phase is when it's in ~arch... >> That also means that to pull a significant number of ebuilds it forces >> mostly everyone to test it.. and that part is annoying.. >=20 > If you don't like it, don't run ~arch. >=20 I have to agree with Ciaran on this one. Furthermore, it's "unrealist" and to an extent "unfair" to impose limitations on "~arch" ebuilds because of "arch" users. Gentoo should support "arch" users, but that doesn't mean making sure "~arch" ebuilds work for "arch" users. When a "arch" user opts to use an "~arch" ebuild, he/she does so at his own risk. About replacing "EAPI-{0,1}" ebuilds with "EAPI-2" ebuilds, I can agree with the proposal, although one can pick earlier versions/revisions from http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/ - -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / SPARC / KDE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkk9zYcACgkQcAWygvVEyAKEmQCfblj0GaZSITsF6/L0PvZVBLyA 1QsAoIote0hbzetNbcrPvWUpTuIOPITW =3DXnAf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----