From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L0Ct4-0006rC-Rb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:23:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01DD0E02BF; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.caf.com.tr (mail.caf.com.tr [88.250.85.68]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03BEE02BF for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:23:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (sunny.caf.com.tr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.caf.com.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576AA39E371 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:23:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=caf.com.tr; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=originating; t=1226485427; bh=nDo2/ +sks4ySCBfw+5NFoq4e97WTCNdaGILiAdBA45c=; b=nl/6C3iznPDnBR8DMdVli YzfNSMy9M9NceCYRx6J0A2IVO3gf5aBkyiDVF+FQhw17wTBQW43NeyIilxzGbh0q 6qUtDDW567JVq5AB14BnXTvkAsgrJs2JmH9NSnpnmNXPu1BaFRHvNI6NIUkybX3m Sc+qx0K9v5K65Dll12nrHg= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at caf.com.tr Received: from mail.caf.com.tr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sunny.caf.com.tr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9OmvKJGUrH8c for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.21] (unknown [10.0.0.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eray.aslan@zeplin.net) by mail.caf.com.tr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2AA139E350 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <491AAEAF.3070703@caf.com.tr> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:23:43 +0200 From: Eray Aslan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] An official Gentoo wiki References: <20081111234532.GG7038@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20081112094442.GL4535@mephisto> In-Reply-To: <20081112094442.GL4535@mephisto> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 333ab666-7afa-4bb7-91a9-131b19d02fce X-Archives-Hash: 1fe537a66b6e9e4cec45991084de9b3b On 12.11.2008 11:44, Michael Hammer wrote: > * Mark Loeser [081112 00:46]: >> What are others feelings on this? > > I like the idea! > >> What issues do you see with having a wiki? > > Pages of poor quality with wrong informations. > >> Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us having a >> wiki? > > We should develop some kind of review process Ugh, got lots of free time? If you want to help, provide hosting or such. A hands off approach should be preferred for wiki. We know it is written by users and some poor quality and even wrong info is expected. Wikis are good for pointers and ideas only. We know that and act accordingly. Moreover, we have official gentoo docs anyway. Developer time is better spent doing, well, developer stuff rather than reviewing some wiki. If you insist on review, it will be at best a stale small site and at worst will cut into your developer time. For what it is worth, as a user I vote you spend time developing gentoo. -- Eray > and at least the > possiblity to lock and hide pages of poor quality. In the most cases > the howtos are related to some herds. What if we have a "reviewed > section" where herds can approve pages and user can be sure that the > infos provided have a minimum of quality. > > g, mueli >