From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L0398-0005d5-7j for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:59:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 230FBE0281; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E717FE0281 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.125] (ip72-220-190-13.sd.sd.cox.net [72.220.190.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E053764D1E for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:59:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <491A1C6C.6040501@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:59:40 -0800 From: Josh Saddler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081005) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] An official Gentoo wiki References: <20081111234532.GG7038@aerie.halcy0n.com> In-Reply-To: <20081111234532.GG7038@aerie.halcy0n.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0874AF053B241ABB12CEA3ED" X-Archives-Salt: db9fc999-25ba-4fb1-ba2c-9f283d582660 X-Archives-Hash: 5ffb0089e41a26f1d55dd66cbcac52c7 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0874AF053B241ABB12CEA3ED Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark Loeser wrote: > So, gentoo-wiki.com went down for a awhile and took something away from= > our users something that is useful. Its back now, but I think we shoul= d > consider having our own official wiki that our users can contribute to.= > We already have something very similar to this on the forums, and this > would just give the correct tool to put their documentation on. >=20 > I already know some people are going to hate this idea and say that the= > documentation could be wrong, etc, so lets look at how others have > handled this situation. It seems that Ubuntu has their own official > documentation section and a community section where users can contribut= e > to. We can put a nice big warning saying that the user documentation > may have some errors, and that any such errors should not be directed a= t > the maintainers of the package or the GDP. >=20 > What are others feelings on this? What issues do you see with having a= > wiki? Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us having a > wiki? >=20 I've asked my fellow GDP members to weigh in on this issue on our ML; the discussion is already in-progress here: http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-doc/msg_dd4f573fc6384108fdf14dfa2703090= 6.xml Or, if you like it gmane-style: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.documentation/2903 --------------enig0874AF053B241ABB12CEA3ED Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkaHG4ACgkQ5aFMlhMsVyWUtgCfVvA3mBGr5DOZIdc7HBEoE9oj j2kAoOzL4MFsi6IW/5VOnQz0kMWvYv4b =IsuS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0874AF053B241ABB12CEA3ED--