From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-33357-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Kxtew-0006Mx-6I
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:27:42 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75A46E01EF;
	Thu,  6 Nov 2008 01:27:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from serverkommune.de (serverkommune.de [88.198.12.136])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFF4E01EF
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  6 Nov 2008 01:27:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 7484 invoked by uid 89); 6 Nov 2008 02:27:38 +0100
Received: from dslb-084-056-132-216.pools.arcor-ip.net (HELO ?192.168.2.100?) (postmaster@digital-trauma.de@84.56.132.216)
  by serverkommune.de with ESMTPA; 6 Nov 2008 02:27:38 +0100
Message-ID: <491247F3.1090309@digital-trauma.de>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 02:27:15 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?VGhvbWFzIFLDtnNuZXI=?= <Thomas.Roesner@digital-trauma.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080930 SeaMonkey/1.1.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: EAPI-2 support
References: <200811022308.49072.loki_val@gentoo.org> <200811032053.59249.loki_val@gentoo.org> <4911E54D.6090008@gentoo.org> <200811051945.32471.loki_val@gentoo.org> <4911FFF7.8030603@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <4911FFF7.8030603@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: f6699564-a7f2-47b5-ab9d-bed672895fc1
X-Archives-Hash: 24bab5f05de1a8bb394ed7372dc4b6ad

Hi,

> And emake is and still should be the default. If there is an issue with it, the ebuild author has to
> change his ebuild. But this should not be taken to force only one makejob for everyone else.
>   

But with rotating storage, don't you (very much) only want one I/O-bound
job at a time?

Regards,
    T.