From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KxQsy-0005nb-Cx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:44:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11779E01D0; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:44:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D944DE03E3 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.255.255.39] (unknown [216.209.201.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA19C6461B for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <491097EB.4070608@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:43:55 -0500 From: Joe Peterson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Reinstating eclasses References: <20081104174307.5bd3d834@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20081104174307.5bd3d834@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a7d40d56-9b8a-400a-be33-3892a3f7ef4e X-Archives-Hash: 40c9eb89b110a12ed5c25c7070bc4caa Christoph Mende wrote: > Now the most logical name for an eclass like that > would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists. Since the new eclass is not version specific, how about simply "xfce.eclass"? -Joe