public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Reinstating eclasses
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 09:35:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <491087C6.9030309@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081104174307.5bd3d834@gentoo.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christoph Mende wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm currently working on a new eclass for Xfce4 that, as opposed to the
> previous ones (xfce42.eclass, xfce44.eclass), is supposed to be used
> for all versions. Now the most logical name for an eclass like that
> would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists. It seems like
> it was used for Xfce 4.2 and has been deprecated for quite some time
> now. Obviously, packages using that eclass (which is zero in the main
> tree and zero in the xfce herd's overlay btw) wouldn't work with my new
> eclass, so I can't just extend said eclass. Now my big question is: Do
> I have to think of a new name for my eclass (was thinking of something
> like xfce4-r1.eclass, which I don't really like though) or can I just
> overwrite the old eclass?
> 

Considering that stable portage (2.1.4.4) uses environment.bz2 and
doesn't need the eclasses to exist for uninstall or binary packages,
and it's exceedingly unlikely that it will hurt anyone, I think you
should go ahead and overwrite the old eclass.
- --
Thanks,
Zac
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkkQh8EACgkQ/ejvha5XGaPvGACdFZMsZTAr6Qi9nyD1/zd24eb6
j00AoKBfHSrXPwUMSsC1WhSwvUVvVgad
=aINW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-04 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-04 16:43 [gentoo-dev] Reinstating eclasses Christoph Mende
2008-11-04 17:35 ` Zac Medico [this message]
2008-11-04 18:22   ` Petteri Räty
2008-11-04 18:30     ` Joe Peterson
2008-11-04 18:43 ` Joe Peterson
2008-11-04 19:15   ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2008-11-04 19:19     ` Joe Peterson
2008-11-04 19:23     ` Christoph Mende
2008-11-04 19:30       ` Joe Peterson
2008-11-04 23:30         ` Duncan
2008-11-05 16:19           ` Steve Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=491087C6.9030309@gentoo.org \
    --to=zmedico@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox