Re: [gentoo-dev] [PMS] Add RESTRICT="distcc" capability

["Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@gentoo.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gordon Malm wrote:

<snip a lot of exchanges>

All the technical discussion on the above is perfectly fine, but the way
the arguments are being presented and the tone used by both sides is
getting arguments into a thin line from becoming flames.
Please step back before turning this into another flame festival.

> I guess the larger question in all this is why does a third party who has 
> demonstrated his anti-Hardened (and anti-Gentoo) slant on multiple occasions 
> define what goes in our PMS?

It's not up to a 3rd party to define what will be or not in PMS. Any 3rd
party is free to contribute to the discussion (within boundaries), but
it's up to the PMs folks to reach agreements about PMS and, or if they
can't, up to the Gentoo Council.

> Gordon Malm (gengor)
> 

- --
Regards,

Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / SPARC / KDE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkNG6IACgkQcAWygvVEyAKOrgCghGO8W2839jXMaMq9DN3DpWbM
JJMAn0PhLDiKoBayr1juI48tzwa8j8Wc
=EXnX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----