public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Saddler <nightmorph@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Adding lxde-base category
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:43:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <490CE9B7.7070802@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <490C3812.4060700@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1329 bytes --]

Ben de Groot wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to add a new category to the tree: lxde-base, to be used
> for the LXDE desktop [1,2] packages, in correspondence to the categories
> for the other desktop environments we have (gnome, kde, xfce). With the
> help of a few users I have been developing ebuilds for these packages in
> the lxde overlay [3], and I would like to move the ebuilds for the
> release versions into the official tree now. (The overlay also contains
> live svn ebuilds.)
> 
> LXDE currently has 14 packages that would go into this new category,
> which is comparable to what xfce-base has. It also uses x11-wm/openbox
> as default WM, and x11-misc/pcmanfm as default filemanager, although
> these can be easily swapped for others.
> 
> Comments are welcome!
> 
> 1: http://lxde.org/
> 2: https://bugs.gentoo.org/157989
> 3: http://www.bitbucket.org/yngwin/lxde-overlay/src/
> 

I dunno . . . given the Xfce (the OTHER lightweight DE) team's decision
to start getting rid of the xfce-* categories, near as I can tell, is
this really consistent with what the rest of the desktop teams are
doin'? Or is it just Xfce that seems to be less consistent with other
categories.

Aside from these recent actions, lxde categories seem like a good idea,
same as for all our other desktops.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-11-01 23:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-01 11:05 [gentoo-dev] RFC: Adding lxde-base category Ben de Groot
2008-11-01 13:00 ` Robert Bridge
2008-11-01 13:32   ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2008-11-01 16:33 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mart Raudsepp
2008-11-01 23:43 ` Josh Saddler [this message]
2008-11-07 19:13 ` Josh Saddler
2008-11-07 21:17   ` Ben de Groot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=490CE9B7.7070802@gentoo.org \
    --to=nightmorph@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox