From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [69.77.167.62] (helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ko15S-0007fI-1u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:22:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 884B8E086F; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from heimdall.creativecommunications.com (creativecommunications.com [65.17.124.162]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD1CE084D for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.80] (unknown [192.168.1.80]) by heimdall.creativecommunications.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4727446141D for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:22:11 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <48EE59E3.40409@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:22:11 -0500 From: Andrew Gaffney User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080930) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for October References: <20081001093002.1D4C26503A@smtp.gentoo.org> <20081009142554.GA10351@comet> <20081009195525.308ce1f5@googlemail.com> <48EE575B.9040802@gentoo.org> <20081009201619.02987bf0@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20081009201619.02987bf0@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2dd5902a-438d-4214-9ce7-642d967b6824 X-Archives-Hash: fe43a52c67816ae40b10e74a37bcc14b Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 12:11:23 -0700 > Zac Medico wrote: >>> I'm guessing it's too late to ask the Council to discuss the "EAPI >>> 2 is brokened :(" thread? What would be the earliest the Council >>> would be able to make a decision upon that? Unfortunately it's >>> something that could get messy if left for too long. >> I think that you may be overreacting. The python-2.6 ebuild from bug >> 240684 is still hard masked in package.mask and I'm doing a >> sys-apps/portage-2.2_rc12 release today that will fix the problem. > > What about pkgcore? It's not Gentoo's primary package manager, so it probably doesn't matter if it goes a few days without getting fixed. The worst that happens is a few people get failed builds, right? -- Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Genkernel + Release Engineering Lead