From: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition)
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:16:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48B4C714.2020209@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080826202309.2e328a27@gentoo.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Michal Kurgan wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:49:12 -0700
> Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> The PROPERTIES approach still seems a lot simpler and practical to
>> me. It seems to me that the approach involving categories introduces
>> needless complexity without bringing any really useful benefits.
>
> Could you elaborate on this categories complexity? I think that the idea is to
> just use already available categories, not implementing additional PROPERTY
> for this functionality.
>
Forcing a relationship with the category name seems more complex and
less flexible than simply having the ability to define
PROPERTIES=virtual in any given ebuild.
- --
Thanks,
Zac
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAki0xxMACgkQ/ejvha5XGaOI1QCgz9yfDUaAH+KnpbhrXtl5qPSn
sccAn0KTXUPhw54KIBIk6soFHNNEkOHB
=xQQ5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-27 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-24 21:01 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition) Zac Medico
2008-08-25 17:51 ` Michal Kurgan
2008-08-25 18:01 ` Zac Medico
2008-08-25 18:37 ` Michal Kurgan
2008-08-25 18:40 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-08-25 19:06 ` Zac Medico
2008-08-25 19:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-08-25 19:36 ` Zac Medico
2008-08-25 19:58 ` Joe Peterson
2008-08-25 20:03 ` David Leverton
2008-08-26 6:39 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2008-08-26 13:20 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-08-26 14:20 ` Duncan
2008-08-26 17:44 ` Zac Medico
2008-08-27 0:08 ` Duncan
2008-08-27 1:49 ` Zac Medico
2008-08-27 2:23 ` Michal Kurgan
2008-08-27 3:16 ` Zac Medico [this message]
2008-08-27 4:18 ` Zac Medico
2008-08-27 3:51 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2008-08-30 9:59 ` Steve Long
2008-08-30 12:23 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-08-31 2:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2008-08-31 12:30 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-08-31 19:10 ` [gentoo-dev] " Joe Peterson
2008-08-31 21:54 ` Duncan
2008-09-05 13:50 ` Marius Mauch
2008-09-05 13:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " Marius Mauch
2008-09-05 15:38 ` Joe Peterson
2008-09-05 15:46 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-09-05 15:50 ` Joe Peterson
2008-09-08 21:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2008-09-08 22:07 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-09-10 1:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48B4C714.2020209@gentoo.org \
--to=zmedico@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox