From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KY2aa-0002ds-Qz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:44:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA3E8E0350; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85797E0350 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.22.10] (ip68-4-152-120.oc.oc.cox.net [68.4.152.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8554C6782A for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <48B440F6.7020705@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:44:22 -0700 From: Zac Medico User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition) References: <48B1CC3C.2000103@gentoo.org> <20080825201217.194fecad@googlemail.com> <48B309C2.1060204@gentoo.org> <200808252103.27006.levertond@googlemail.com> <20080826142044.28367055@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 140052c8-120c-4c81-8952-c2373dde373c X-Archives-Hash: 931a937c1a75383ccab44abd5ea47bd2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: > I therefore believe I like just moving them all to a *virtual*/ category > better, thus obviating the need for that particular property in the first > place. This has been suggested elsewhere in the thread [1] but I think the the PROPERTIES approach will be more flexible and practical for the reasons that I've already stated. [1] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_65636255c9d284e51898e826cae09ffd.xml - -- Thanks, Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAki0QPEACgkQ/ejvha5XGaPtJgCdFTpDzQfSo6zARHSje8b+h7I7 OAAAnjzo8SdYaeZ7Cmqnj+5xUSHlU7i+ =Gj7B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----