From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KXiCT-0003ep-GU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:58:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 772BBE03F9; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shadow.wildlava.net (shadow.wildlava.net [67.40.138.81]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53882E03F9 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [67.40.138.82] (crater.wildlava.net [67.40.138.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shadow.wildlava.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5009F8F429 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:58:03 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <48B30EC9.2090808@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:58:01 -0600 From: Joe Peterson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080727) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition) References: <48B1CC3C.2000103@gentoo.org> <20080825194019.2b593fbf@googlemail.com> <48B302BB.3050307@gentoo.org> <20080825201217.194fecad@googlemail.com> <48B309C2.1060204@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <48B309C2.1060204@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: fce63623-ff26-44db-a523-90bcdaa18115 X-Archives-Hash: 3ccfe30c99cde3b15718097075380152 Zac Medico wrote: >> Then change the name. Call it "zero-install-cost". > > I'm inclined toward "virtual" since it's more brief and I think it > might strike a chord with more people because of their familiarity > with the "virtual" category and old-style PROVIDE virtuals. We'll > have to see what others have to say. Zac, absolutely. ++ -Joe