From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KInDU-0004vX-2n for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:17:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2A3EE051C; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (smtp03.tky.fi [82.130.63.73]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6736DE051C for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.209] ([82.130.46.209]) by smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (SMSSMTP 4.1.9.35) with SMTP id M2008071519164205634 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:16:42 +0300 Message-ID: <487CCD6A.4030804@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:16:42 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080629) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 References: <20080713071118.GC1891@comet> <20080713235255.0e2b7f8e@googlemail.com> <20080714002117.731f1408@googlemail.com> <487CC909.6040109@gentoo.org> <20080715171152.4ffb64b9@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20080715171152.4ffb64b9@snowcone> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB8AF3BA69B16F55A3E1BF9F1" X-Archives-Salt: 1b805315-acea-47ef-b236-8c3220fd571b X-Archives-Hash: 5036c6e61d08ebcc6ce5ce9232a0ce8a This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB8AF3BA69B16F55A3E1BF9F1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti: > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:58:01 +0300 > Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: >> Yes I can think a lot of features like this that would be of great >> use in the main tree but as long as Portage is the only official and >> stable package manager and doesn't support the things you listed, the >> GLEP is not of much use. >=20 > So you're saying the GLEP's of no use until Portage supports them, but > Portage can't support them until you say yes to the GLEP... >=20 I am saying that it makes sense to approve both at the same time or have = other official package managers approved before accepting the GLEP. Regards, Petteri --------------enigB8AF3BA69B16F55A3E1BF9F1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkh8zWoACgkQcxLzpIGCsLTyLwCfUGb10v6E3s8V1pCcGdu5vTAr wkUAn13/ts1iT99OeZ6XHQP828i6SMKU =kYEo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB8AF3BA69B16F55A3E1BF9F1-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list