From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KImvP-0002rM-Oh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:58:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02DC9E0589; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (smtp03.tky.fi [82.130.63.73]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD2B1E0589 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.209] ([82.130.46.209]) by smtp-3.tky.hut.fi (SMSSMTP 4.1.9.35) with SMTP id M2008071518580105013 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:58:01 +0300 Message-ID: <487CC909.6040109@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:58:01 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080629) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 References: <20080713071118.GC1891@comet> <20080713235255.0e2b7f8e@googlemail.com> <20080714002117.731f1408@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080714002117.731f1408@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF5635BB6BFA6E5EEEBDB4EBF" X-Archives-Salt: 130772f2-d1f4-4e1f-9c96-bcc90db88c0f X-Archives-Hash: f1f39cee689d35394c11eaae5d4f227b This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF5635BB6BFA6E5EEEBDB4EBF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti: > On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:16:23 -0700 > "Alec Warner" wrote: >> As far as could be determined by the members at the meeting there no >> compelling examples in Gentoo who to change or add global scope >> functions in future EAPIs. As such those problems as stated are not >> in scope for Gentoo because Gentoo is not attempting to do those >> things at this time. >=20 > You mean you don't want per-category/package eclasses, or eclasses that= > can indicate that they only work with some EAPIs, or eclasses that can > indicate that they're being used incorrectly, or the death of > EXPORT_FUNCTIONS? All of these have been discussed as desirable future > extensions. >=20 Yes I can think a lot of features like this that would be of great use=20 in the main tree but as long as Portage is the only official and stable=20 package manager and doesn't support the things you listed, the GLEP is=20 not of much use. Regards, Petteri --------------enigF5635BB6BFA6E5EEEBDB4EBF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkh8yQkACgkQcxLzpIGCsLRFnQCdEBEjgPKV7G+hOKVfuA+sc3Gj apwAoJ32RwZFk+u6L+8JXQN7HMOORtqT =leUO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF5635BB6BFA6E5EEEBDB4EBF-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list