[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-scheme/drscheme: ChangeLog reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-scheme/drscheme: ChangeLog reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild

[Robin H. Johnson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 950 bytes --]

On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:53:06PM +0000, Marijn Schouten (hkbst) wrote:
> hkbst       08/06/28 16:53:06
> 
>   Modified:             ChangeLog
>   Added:                reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild
>                         drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild
>   Log:
>   add new major version 4.0.1 and reversion latest ~
>   (Portage version: 2.2_rc1/cvs/Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r8 x86_64)
...
> 1.1                  dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch
> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
Why was reversion.patch committed directly to dev-scheme/drscheme
instead of files/?

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy
E-Mail     : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 329 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-scheme/drscheme: ChangeLog reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild

[Marijn Schouten (hkBst)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:53:06PM +0000, Marijn Schouten (hkbst) wrote:
>> hkbst       08/06/28 16:53:06
>>
>>   Modified:             ChangeLog
>>   Added:                reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild
>>                         drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild
>>   Log:
>>   add new major version 4.0.1 and reversion latest ~
>>   (Portage version: 2.2_rc1/cvs/Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r8 x86_64)
> ...
>> 1.1                  dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch
>> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup
>> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
> Why was reversion.patch committed directly to dev-scheme/drscheme
> instead of files/?
> 

Because it is a patch I would've liked to apply to some ebuilds, not something
I'm applying to sources. The tools won't let me keep it uncommitted easily.

Marijn

- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkhsqIUACgkQp/VmCx0OL2xnGwCgwy1QiSruuSFBLHgw4aMHvMCD
gjwAn0oi7WAoTozSdprszabKgLmlugBJ
=Ywad
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-scheme/drscheme: ChangeLog reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild

[Ryan Hill]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1474 bytes --]

On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:23:01 +0200
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@gentoo.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:53:06PM +0000, Marijn Schouten (hkbst)
> > wrote:
> >> hkbst       08/06/28 16:53:06
> >>
> >>   Modified:             ChangeLog
> >>   Added:                reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild
> >>                         drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild
> >>   Log:
> >>   add new major version 4.0.1 and reversion latest ~
> >>   (Portage version: 2.2_rc1/cvs/Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r8 x86_64)
> > ...
> >> 1.1                  dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch
> >> file :
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup
> >> plain:
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
> > Why was reversion.patch committed directly to dev-scheme/drscheme
> > instead of files/?
> > 
> 
> Because it is a patch I would've liked to apply to some ebuilds, not
> something I'm applying to sources. The tools won't let me keep it
> uncommitted easily.

Then put it in an overlay or something?


-- 
gcc-porting,                                      by design, by neglect
treecleaner,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]