From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K9EoU-0000tf-AO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:44:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99FD5E037B; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74403E037B for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.6] (unknown [151.57.27.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2844675F3 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <485A0E69.10104@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:44:41 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080601) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] References: <20080611070618.54E4066E24@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080613102240.4ba5d144@googlemail.com> <8b4c83ad0806130310y71e62485u48baa828e09c4450@mail.gmail.com> <200806131119.40500.levertond@googlemail.com> <48524A82.6020400@gentoo.org> <1213834689.15712.14.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> In-Reply-To: <1213834689.15712.14.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 46a597eb-e731-4560-a426-8e1e448b1cf8 X-Archives-Hash: e1d0cd13144d9401a2b70d99f8e05378 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 12:22 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: >> David Leverton wrote: >>> On Friday 13 June 2008 11:10:46 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >>>> Interesting to note, however, that Paludis doesn't accept inline >>>> comments, and this behaviour predates PMS. >>> There's a reason for Paludis not accepting them, and the same reason applies >>> to the question of allowing them in PMS or not, therefore PMS doesn't allow >>> them. There's no evil conspiracy here, just pure logic. >> Care to share the logic and wise reasoning ? > > [ "${IDEA_ORIGIN}" != "Ciaran" ] && die I tend to agree. -- Luca Barbato Gentoo Council Member Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list