public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dhruba Bandopadhyay" <dhruba@codewordt.co.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Enemy Territory ebuild
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:39:00 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4854.146.176.63.67.1066739940.squirrel@mail.codewordt.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1066483836.28203.13.camel@localhost>

<quote who="Chris Gianelloni">
> I want to ask the opinion of everyone.  I updated Enemy-Territory
> yesterday to close two bugs.  In doing so, I made the decision to make
> the newest version of Enemy Territory use the new full download.  I have
> had requests from people to have the full download, rather than the
> original download + patches, as the ebuild.

Few alternative suggestions:

(1) Have use flag 'patchpkg' or 'patch'.  If enabled patch the package
otherwise download.  This is a long term solution that could be used by
other packages too (although I hear you wish to avoid use flags).

(2) Check what files present in distfiles.  The user should fetch patch
manually into distfiles to enable patching.

  (2) (a) If only patch file present the ebuild opts for patching.

  (2) (b) If only full new download present ebuild uses it.

  (2) (c) If both present ebuild uses full download.

(3) Use an environment variable like USE_PATCH="yes".  They are more
environmentally friendly given the late explosion in number of use flags
making them unmanageable and resulting in information overload.

Adding to the thought pool.  Take from it what you will.  :)

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-21 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-18 13:30 [gentoo-dev] Enemy Territory ebuild Chris Gianelloni
2003-10-18 18:13 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
2003-10-18 19:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Matt Thrailkill
2003-10-18 21:53   ` Mike Frysinger
2003-10-19  0:08   ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20  7:48     ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-10-18 19:39 ` Stroller
2003-10-19 13:31 ` Corvus Corax
2003-10-19 14:01   ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-10-20  6:06     ` Mike Frysinger
     [not found] ` <B6AD5486-01A2-11D8-A06D-000A95795F3E@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
2003-10-19 13:52   ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-10-21 12:39 ` Dhruba Bandopadhyay [this message]
2003-10-21 13:15   ` Chris Gianelloni
     [not found]     ` <893C9795-03ED-11D8-AF70-000A95795F3E@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
2003-10-21 20:23       ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Use of USE flags..? Was: " Chris Gianelloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4854.146.176.63.67.1066739940.squirrel@mail.codewordt.co.uk \
    --to=dhruba@codewordt.co.uk \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-user@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox