From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K75O3-0003UG-MX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:15:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6105AE05BC; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:15:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailhub-lb1.unibe.ch (mailhub-lb1.unibe.ch [130.92.0.82]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BBFE05BC for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:15:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (scanhub-lb1.unibe.ch [130.92.5.65]) by mailhub-lb1.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3E111C0AD for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:15:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-checked: by University of Bern - Mailgateway Received: from mailhub-lb1.unibe.ch ([130.92.0.82]) by localhost (scanhub-lb1.unibe.ch [130.92.5.65]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id PmtFj4TgJlrb for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:15:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from asterix.unibe.ch (asterix.unibe.ch [130.92.64.4]) by mailhub-lb1.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CCC11C0CE for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:15:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [130.92.65.87] (cubert [130.92.65.87]) by asterix.unibe.ch (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m5D9Fo0g025287 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:15:50 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <48523AEF.2020608@dev.gentooexperimental.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:16:31 +0200 From: Patrick Lauer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] References: <20080611070618.54E4066E24@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080612212148.GB14670@basestar> <200806122258.26896.levertond@googlemail.com> <75f3dce80806121813y5d417574kb7283c285e296562@mail.gmail.com> <20080613062612.46931b33@googlemail.com> <4852375F.7010201@dev.gentooexperimental.org> <7DB0FAE7-6F92-43D5-BB33-0048403A0281@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <7DB0FAE7-6F92-43D5-BB33-0048403A0281@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a47f59c4-21be-4d99-83db-d35ec4c36a9b X-Archives-Hash: 6725749bbe07223d84247e17284327b7 Fernando J. Pereda wrote: >>> >> Just to pour some oil on the flames - > > Then don't do it. You are doing a very bad marketing for the pkgcore > guys with your whinnings. Dude. Shut up. I'm not a pkgcore guy. If anything I'm a portage supporter. That I accidentally host pkgcore.org doesn't mean I'm "one of them". > > >> Y'all are aware that paludis can't parse a valid make.conf and does >> ignore package.keywords at times, yes? >> >> Test case is: >> >> FEATURES="strict" # test and stricter fail >> >> in make.conf ... if you had the tests you claim others lack that >> would have been fixed a long time ago. > > Yes, we are aware of that bug in a feature we consider highly > experimental. Hmm, I'd have guessed config files are moderately relevant. And why don't y'all fix a bug like that? First you insult others for not doing tests, then you show a lack of tests and are proud of it. Augh. > > You are amusing... Hey, I gave you a testcase - now fix it, chop chop! -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list