From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K759G-0002Am-Ao for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:00:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4822CE0456; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailhub-lb2.unibe.ch (mailhub-lb2.unibe.ch [130.92.0.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8A5E0456 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (scanhub-lb1.unibe.ch [130.92.5.65]) by mailhub-lb2.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8041BC4126 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:00:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-checked: by University of Bern - Mailgateway Received: from mailhub-lb2.unibe.ch ([130.92.0.83]) by localhost (scanhub-lb1.unibe.ch [130.92.5.65]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id KrkBEqM9w+Vd for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:00:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from asterix.unibe.ch (asterix.unibe.ch [130.92.64.4]) by mailhub-lb2.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id B995EC402D for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:00:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [130.92.65.87] (cubert [130.92.65.87]) by asterix.unibe.ch (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m5D90cDc024461 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:00:38 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <4852375F.7010201@dev.gentooexperimental.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:01:19 +0200 From: Patrick Lauer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] References: <20080611070618.54E4066E24@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080612212148.GB14670@basestar> <200806122258.26896.levertond@googlemail.com> <75f3dce80806121813y5d417574kb7283c285e296562@mail.gmail.com> <20080613062612.46931b33@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080613062612.46931b33@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: bc9476dd-34a0-4ca9-9905-bc89b5091f7f X-Archives-Hash: 12f64e84ad9b4ce14d37f803bed36ad5 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:30:54 +0530 > "Arun Raghavan" wrote: > >> And why do you have to be plain insulting about it? Nobody can >> magically spot every single bug in any piece of code presented to >> them. In fact it's why the "given enough eyes ..." adage is one of the >> bases of open source development. >> > > Which is why any responsible person ensures good test coverage. > Just to pour some oil on the flames - Y'all are aware that paludis can't parse a valid make.conf and does ignore package.keywords at times, yes? Test case is: FEATURES="strict" # test and stricter fail in make.conf ... if you had the tests you claim others lack that would have been fixed a long time ago. So please stop trolling when you fail so badly at it. > >> I _honestly_ do not understand why there is so much trouble in simple >> cooperation amongst adults. >> > > I agree entirely. Why the pkgcore people refuse to do basic automated > tests is completely beyond me. > Mirror, mirror on the wall. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list