From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6qfF-0005zC-1h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:32:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B10F4E051B; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:32:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736C7E051B for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:32:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z27so400114ugc.49 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:32:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wgqMqayR17f8byx6rY6EhiyE3qKbR4ufYkP00bhOLoc=; b=MbmK8I3Zm0Z3r++og+JWZ2JVXGddQJ6K0ZOxR5AP4WO94PGrjgUoRqx2Qz5Tmkn0NJ oSZTcihEuGQ/GUfzhtBHBU0N9fwET3sthP4X3Neps1jqaWLjUcktogFYcE+f2oOWfnQD QOr3CKY7i3C0DCNOrPjk84Uvvcq5iBBqjR//U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=U5BaHoQWKFiIPSt663mHmVAC1Mc55pGdpghdoZScF6My+ETgerscIcEii2ebXDqn8e YcXkAdOjvOasItTPpo2hhPn6uJZbHJ8YdPPPk6SKb3xuF21ZxS5fZnjczYW5bnnIaJcn FC7VrooMyuNRmOOYocAKcrGi6uW15ftPivLmI= Received: by 10.66.218.15 with SMTP id q15mr2682161ugg.8.1213291962920; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:32:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.144? ( [84.68.62.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm7691662ugf.62.2008.06.12.10.32.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:32:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48515DB3.1040502@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:32:35 +0100 From: George Prowse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] References: <20080611070618.54E4066E24@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080611215827.GB7074@comet> <20080612084128.7221bb09@googlemail.com> <4850D5AD.2090108@gentoo.org> <20080612090136.43f0beac@googlemail.com> <4850DA7F.7030406@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4850DA7F.7030406@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 277c93f2-4eef-47d6-843e-5ae27b09c11b X-Archives-Hash: 0164a9dd7d05e8999aee4bbaff3c2652 Luca Barbato wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> Package manager maintainers refusing to do basic testing before >> claiming support for a new EAPI has very messy consequences. If package >> manager maintainers aren't going to do the responsible thing, the whole >> point of EAPIs is lost. > > Thats a circular argument since portage and pkgcore developers are > complaining about eapi definition and PMS management. > > lu > If the bickering is stopping development then maybe it should be given to a 3rd party to complete and have the last word. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list