From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6hcZ-0007sg-Tk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:53:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21C68E04F5; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cp-out12.libero.it (cp-out12.libero.it [212.52.84.112]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEE4E04F5 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.6] (151.57.14.216) by cp-out12.libero.it (8.5.014) id 484D2FE80067E259 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:53:21 +0200 Message-ID: <4850D5AD.2090108@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:52:13 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080601) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] References: <20080611070618.54E4066E24@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080611215827.GB7074@comet> <20080612084128.7221bb09@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080612084128.7221bb09@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 986c32fa-4948-4863-9949-39f8f20b6afc X-Archives-Hash: 43b74127c166dc7141623605e2b5f986 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > No, we were trying to get the pkgcore people to write some frickin' > test cases for their code rather than continuing to screw up the > process by incorrectly claiming support for an EAPI. That isn't what has been perceived. Whoever will take the portage specification will have to provide testcases while updating the spec, correctly split an version it to make implementation easier and behave properly. > You should instead be asking the pkgcore guys why they should be > allowed to continue keeping a package in the tree when they're > blatantly ignoring the EAPI process. The eapi process is something not defined so they cannot do much about it, same for the portage people. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo Council Member Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list