From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6JQz-0003PK-BT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:03:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41599E0561; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cp-out7.libero.it (cp-out7.libero.it [212.52.84.107]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53FEE0561 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.6] (151.57.14.216) by cp-out7.libero.it (8.5.014) id 484D2FE7003C1D1C for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:03:36 +0200 Message-ID: <484F6A88.6090404@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:02:48 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080601) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2 - Let's get it started References: <484EAB4F.6070608@gentoo.org> <484EAC1C.4020009@dev.gentooexperimental.org> <8b4c83ad0806100933vb06644ehcbe4b4e3d4006601@mail.gmail.com> <484EAE4A.6020902@gentoo.org> <20080611001123.GA7972@seldon.metaweb.com> <20080611065737.3ac6cfb6@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080611065737.3ac6cfb6@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a447e49c-e3ff-4d73-be77-831bf03db6c0 X-Archives-Hash: 72e24133ab6a76d7ea93c389913703b0 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:11:23 -0700 > Brian Harring wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 05:54:49PM +0100, Richard Brown wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 17:39, Doug Goldstein >>> wrote: >>>> At this point, we should really only discuss features that all 3 >>>> package managers have implemented. >>> I'm not sure that's a good idea, only two have implemented EAPI 1 >>> so far. >> 3 have. If you're aware of a pkgcore issue, then kindly file a bug >> rather then going for mocking on -dev. > > Had you bothered to write even trivial test suites for EAPI 1, you'd've > found at least one major bug straight away. http://www.pkgcore.org/trac/pkgcore/newticket lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo Council Member Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list