From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6JPZ-0003JI-Nf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:02:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB483E0550; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cp-out10.libero.it (cp-out10.libero.it [212.52.84.110]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A11E0552 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.6] (151.57.14.216) by cp-out10.libero.it (8.5.014) id 484D2FE8003C8A31 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:02:18 +0200 Message-ID: <484F6A3A.9000500@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:01:30 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080601) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2 - Let's get it started References: <484EAB4F.6070608@gentoo.org> <200806110011.41718.zlin@gentoo.org> <20080611010347.6ced7db2@sheridan.genone.homeip.net> <200806110142.38384.zlin@gentoo.org> <20080611074944.00965ad2@toz.strangled.net> <20080611065442.38e67d90@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080611065442.38e67d90@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: beaed142-25b2-4c59-93fb-50ac07312611 X-Archives-Hash: eae920f59fe1c7bdd515c5c9ab225ca4 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:49:44 +0200 > Alexis Ballier wrote: >> I thought tests were already supposed to pass whatever the EAPI is and >> devs were supposed to run them... > > Supposedly. But in practice this isn't true, because far too many > developers just don't care. and having it forced in the eapi won't change this. > Enforcing src_test in a "you must explicitly say so if your package's > test suites are expected to fail" way on an EAPI bump is a clean way of > recovering from this. You are assuming that every package has a test (false), nobody will have src_test dummified. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo Council Member Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list