From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6JEw-0002LP-4m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:51:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 894C0E04F5; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailfilter13.ihug.co.nz (mailfilter13.ihug.co.nz [203.109.136.13]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11515E04F5 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:51:19 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUBAKMET0h2XaBX/2dsb2JhbAAIsFGBWg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,622,1204455600"; d="scan'208";a="104781225" Received: from 118-93-160-87.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz (HELO [10.1.1.3]) ([118.93.160.87]) by smtp.mailfilter5.ihug.co.nz with ESMTP; 11 Jun 2008 17:51:17 +1200 Message-ID: <484F67B9.1060909@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:50:49 +1200 From: Alistair Bush User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080606) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2 - Let's get it started References: <484EAB4F.6070608@gentoo.org> <484EAE4A.6020902@gentoo.org> <200806101706.41801.bugs@dev.gentooexperimental.org> In-Reply-To: <200806101706.41801.bugs@dev.gentooexperimental.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 548971d7-5433-4ede-a588-96a7b82dd50c X-Archives-Hash: 10c37cdbd6c38514ce04751902a38d09 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On Tuesday 10 June 2008 16:54:49 Richard Brown wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 17:39, Doug Goldstein wrote: >>> At this point, we should really only discuss features that all 3 package >>> managers have implemented. >> I'm not sure that's a good idea, only two have implemented EAPI 1 so far. >> > Yes, but noone cares about Paludis. > > Now could you please do the rest of us a favour and keep the discussion > focussed on improving technical details instead of random insults at others? Isn't that, in itself, an insult and you don't seem to have advanced the discussion at all. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list