From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K66sm-0000gl-Nb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:39:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FFF8E057B; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nameserver1.mcve.com (nameserver1.mcve.com [216.155.111.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A04DE057B for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.55] (shop.monetra.com [216.155.111.10]) by nameserver1.mcve.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DC6111010F for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:39:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <484EAE4A.6020902@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:39:38 -0400 From: Doug Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080603) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2 - Let's get it started References: <484EAB4F.6070608@gentoo.org> <484EAC1C.4020009@dev.gentooexperimental.org> <8b4c83ad0806100933vb06644ehcbe4b4e3d4006601@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8b4c83ad0806100933vb06644ehcbe4b4e3d4006601@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 242b77f8-772f-4760-8014-014476c00ee0 X-Archives-Hash: ac47ed925c162141767cd7be8ab02ec2 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Patrick Lauer > wrote: > >> So EAPI 2 is not "everything shiny", but a small iterative improvement to >> EAPI 1. >> >> Suggest features then and let's discuss! >> > > For reference of existing ideas -- https://bugs.gentoo.org/174380 -- a > tracker for EAPI feature requests. > > I personally like https://bugs.gentoo.org/197859 the most -- split out > src_configure from src_compile which will allow sane resuming of > compiles :) > > At this point, we should really only discuss features that all 3 package managers have implemented. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list