From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-84204-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A42841382C5
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 23:57:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D877E0963;
	Wed, 21 Mar 2018 23:56:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 435B5E095C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 23:56:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.2.102] (ipservice-092-214-198-247.092.214.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.214.198.247])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: chithanh)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0957B335C06
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 23:56:21 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Mailing list moderation and community openness
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <4aab96fa-0edb-6a28-791e-28e2103f2a30@gentoo.org>
 <0818a5b0-cc1e-403f-6c08-1285999de30f@gentoo.org>
 <20180320160316.GA5785@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> <87605qs3pi.fsf@gentoo.org>
 <CAGfcS_nfVWtaq6cJz2m_-OB2+poVmxeYWi3sgUY9qHoxoKQWrg@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ch=c3=ad-Thanh_Christopher_Nguy=e1=bb=85n?=
 <chithanh@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <481edfbe-9c78-1102-82fb-8f67b51b5fb0@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:56:33 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.5.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_nfVWtaq6cJz2m_-OB2+poVmxeYWi3sgUY9qHoxoKQWrg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: f5f856e1-b5c5-428b-adb2-aa542a13b723
X-Archives-Hash: cec69ae6d57c1b204adaf980f0ff76c6

Rich Freeman schrieb:

> Actually, I think it is more of a technical constraint.  It is
> basically impossible to blacklist somebody on a mailing list, since
> all they need to do is roll up a new email address.
> 
> I can think of various arguments for whitelisting or not whitelisting,
> but it seems silly to blacklist.

And how often did it actually happen that blacklisting was evaded on -dev
mailing list?


Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn