From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JrxR2-0007Vb-Su for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 15:44:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A28C2E06CC; Fri, 2 May 2008 15:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from postak-1.fzu.cz (pc175e.fzu.cz [147.231.127.175]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4658BE06CC for ; Fri, 2 May 2008 15:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from postak-3.fzu.cz (postak3.fzu.cz [10.128.1.5]) by postak-1.fzu.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m42Fi2fC009354 for ; Fri, 2 May 2008 17:44:02 +0200 Received: from [147.231.27.134] (pc134c.fzu.cz [147.231.27.134]) by postak-3.fzu.cz (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m42FiAUf004415 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 2 May 2008 17:44:10 +0200 Message-ID: <481B36C7.3090202@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 17:44:07 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Kundr=E1t?= Organization: Gentoo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070818) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: language bindings as separate packages References: <20080501150930.GA25855@nibiru.local> <481AC22E.7020908@gentoo.org> <20080502090014.GE25855@nibiru.local> <481ADF56.9020402@gentoo.org> <20080502102104.GG25855@nibiru.local> In-Reply-To: <20080502102104.GG25855@nibiru.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Sendmail with Milter API 5.6.20, bases: 20080502 #735450, check: 20080502 clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.9-postak (2007-02-13) on postak1.fzu.cz X-Archives-Salt: 1fc0b69d-26e8-4fbb-98c4-211a5941ff96 X-Archives-Hash: 9b91ab434b725cc154305c40e8307e1f Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Maybe you remember the discussions about stable vs. dev kernel > branches: the kernel folks wanted to give up stable branches, > leaving them to the individual distros and concentrate just on > devel branch. A lot of people were totally unhappy with this > idea, so they abondened the idea. Otherwise the kernel would > have been the killer job for an project like OSS-QM. What you mean by the "stable branch", the 2.4.x, 2.6.16.x or something completely different? Cheers, -jkt -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list