From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JpFNf-00066u-Kw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:17:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B349FE051B; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rs25s3.datacenter.cha.cantv.net (rs25s3.datacenter.cha.cantv.net [200.44.33.34]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769C9E051B for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:17:44 +0000 (UTC) X-DNSBL-MILTER: Passed Received: from localhost ([190.37.171.82]) by rs25s3.datacenter.cha.cantv.net (8.13.8/8.13.0/3.0) with ESMTP id m3P4HhDM017009 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:47:43 -0430 X-Matched-Lists: [] Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JpEhu-0006b4-U5 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:34:42 -0400 Message-ID: <48115152.5030504@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:34:42 -0400 From: Luis Francisco Araujo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080305) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Prioritising contact information in metadata.xml References: <20080424220535.7b3c0c9a@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <4811048B.1090800@gentoo.org> <18449.22150.321370.913536@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <18449.22150.321370.913536@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.93, clamav-milter version 0.93 on 10.128.1.89 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Archives-Salt: edb34f55-30da-400f-8592-e029851c4bce X-Archives-Hash: 438321f26df16a05965b99149ebe1318 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ulrich Mueller wrote: |>>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Luis Francisco Araujo wrote: | |> | One other thing is that it is sometimes difficult to figure out to |> | whom a bug should be assigned, because metadata.xml for many packages |> | simply isn't clear. If you list a few developers as well as a herd, |> | does that mean you want bugs assigned to the herd or to a single |> | developer who happens to be in that list? Some packages list several |> | herds in metadata.xml. Bugs can be assigned to just one address | |> I'd say that in the case of a herd listed , the bug should be sent |> there. | | A common case is a herd plus a specific maintainer, and I think then | it should be assigned to the maintainer, with a CC to the herd's team. | |> If it doesn't specify a herd but several developers, sending the bug |> to any or all of them should be the rule. | | In this case, it should be assigned to the first developer listed, and | all others in CC. | If this is the case, I think this should be stated somewhere in the docs , since the order of listed maintainers don't have any priority, and I personally would prefer to keep it so. - -- Luis F. Araujo "araujo at gentoo.org" Gentoo Linux -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkgRUVIACgkQNir3WYj9aLoEjQCeIvFaInENgCOhz65K9CaywFa4 C7gAnjjQAT82gerNwWmModYBVEpVHBrF =V6VD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list