From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JpAGF-00016Y-J6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:49:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21895E04EC; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rs26s12.datacenter.cha.cantv.net (rs26s12.datacenter.cha.cantv.net [200.44.33.17]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CE2E04EC for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:49:44 +0000 (UTC) X-DNSBL-MILTER: Passed Received: from localhost (dBE25AB52.dslam-01-3-15-01-1-01.smg.dsl.cantv.net [190.37.171.82]) by rs26s12.datacenter.cha.cantv.net (8.13.8/8.13.0/3.0) with ESMTP id m3OMnirm004010 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:19:44 -0430 X-Matched-Lists: [] Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jp9b3-00068w-4W for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:07:17 -0400 Message-ID: <4811048B.1090800@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:07:07 -0400 From: Luis Francisco Araujo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080305) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Prioritising contact information in metadata.xml References: <20080424220535.7b3c0c9a@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <20080424220535.7b3c0c9a@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.93, clamav-milter version 0.93 on 10.128.1.89 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Archives-Salt: e5c757d5-47fe-45f6-810d-380cdb76e213 X-Archives-Hash: 7d5b1d9f916edd4aca48562a16c80f76 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jeroen Roovers wrote: | Hi developers and other users, | | | since jakub[1] went completely missing a few weeks ago a few others and | I have been wrangling the bugs. I've heard rumours that this isn't | working smoothly yet. Of course most of that can be fully blamed on | bugzilla itself, but there are some things that need to be pointed out | or discussed. | | One thing I'd like to point out is that if you don't agree with a | specific mangle, just CC whoever did it on the bug and explain. | If you don't give me the feedback, I can never know how you would | rather have wanted to get bugs delivered. | | One other thing is that it is sometimes difficult to figure out to | whom a bug should be assigned, because metadata.xml for many packages | simply isn't clear. If you list a few developers as well as a herd, | does that mean you want bugs assigned to the herd or to a single | developer who happens to be in that list? Some packages list several | herds in metadata.xml. Bugs can be assigned to just one address | (or you get "Assignee: jer@gentoo.org,bug-wranglers@gentoo.org did not | match anything"). | I'd say that in the case of a herd listed , the bug should be sent there. If it doesn't specify a herd but several developers, sending the bug to any or all of them should be the rule. | All in all I guess we need to make the rules up as we go and decide | policy later. I suggest the first herd/address in the list should be | the primary contact. If you don't agree with that, please consult I agree. - -- Luis F. Araujo "araujo at gentoo.org" Gentoo Linux -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkgRBIoACgkQNir3WYj9aLp8UwCfeiHyHDQCDXd1nw0/oauctVVc UWkAn0Y4b1Be65A0ThXqDQIbTXRGbKSv =YVb7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list