From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JhOxF-0007c2-2D for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:54:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F53DE0B03; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailhub-lb3.unibe.ch (mailhub-lb3.unibe.ch [130.92.0.84]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02795E0B03 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (scanhub-lb1.unibe.ch [130.92.5.65]) by mailhub-lb3.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627F5C41F4 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:54:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-checked: by University of Bern Received: from mailhub-lb3.unibe.ch ([130.92.0.84]) by localhost (scanhub-lb1.unibe.ch [130.92.5.65]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id w3JH3VCiYnjv for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:54:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from asterix.unibe.ch (asterix.unibe.ch [130.92.64.4]) by mailhub-lb3.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE492C42E6 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:54:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [130.92.65.87] (cubert [130.92.65.87]) by asterix.unibe.ch (8.13.6+Sun/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m33Cs5gu023192 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:54:05 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <47F4D3CF.6010204@dev.gentooexperimental.org> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:55:43 +0200 From: Patrick Lauer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080304) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April References: <20080401092610.EEF7467349@smtp.gentoo.org> <47F3F098.1050508@gentoo.org> <47F3F860.6080200@gentoo.org> <47F3FA1C.7010407@gentoo.org> <47F4395A.3000509@gentoo.org> <47F4B9FC.2010907@gentoo.org> <47F4C0F8.7040906@gentoo.org> <20080403123921.3fc33a77@snowcone> <47F4C456.6080704@gentoo.org> <47F4C60B.8080605@gentoo.org> <20080403130151.12507f1a@snowcone> <47F4CAEF.2080106@gentoo.org> <20080403132326.19595c4b@snowcone> <47F4CD96.3070409@dev.gentooexperimental.org> <20080403133350.113f5696@snowcone> <47F4D13D.8010009@dev.gentooexperimental.org> <20080403134633.04f68a36@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20080403134633.04f68a36@snowcone> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 76fcf6a7-b5fc-4564-bb9d-431770570b2a X-Archives-Hash: 708617e1478a8268edaaf2c9131e4e5e Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:44:45 +0200 > Patrick Lauer wrote: > >> and then, from that design space, select the option(s) that have the >> best behaviour. If you get bored you can read the not-yet-GLEPs >> robbat2 has written with the help of a few others, which would cut >> out a large part of the discussion: >> http://viewcvs.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/users/robbat2/tree-signing-gleps/ >> > > Uh... Which signing system did you think we were discussing when we > started talking about signing the tree? > Well, now we agree that we talk about the same thing after only 4 email pingpongs. That is quite fast! >> But if you don't trust anyone there is no reason why you would even >> try to interact with Gentoo. So at some point you will have to decide >> to arbitrarily trust a few entities, be it devs or servers or >> cryptographic keys ... >> > > Uh huh, which is what my original reply to Mike was all about. > > We're way ahead of you here... > Or so you think. So now that you've tried to label me as a dimwit we're past that stage and can now return to actually discussing the set of issues and how to handle them, ja? -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list