public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC & baselayout-2 meets Gentoo
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:53:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47E822BE.3000808@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803241742.04507.vapier@gentoo.org>

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 24 March 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>   
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>     
>>> On Monday 24 March 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>>       
>>>> And by all upgrade paths would that include adding the bad
>>>> conversion of /etc/modules.autoload.d/
>>>>         
>>> looks/tested correct to me
>>>       
>> breaks for anything with a module parameter
>>     
>
> last i looked module parameters were not allowed.  but it's a good thing it's 
> p.masked so we can fix it easily.
> -mike
>   
/etc/modules.autoload.d has always allowed module parameters to appear 
after the module name.

/etc/conf.d/modules has allowed a completely different syntax requiring 
variables based on the module name to be set with the module parameters.

This is where Roy and I have been stuck as far as an automatic 
conversion process. The stuff you included in the openrc-9999 ebuild was 
something I had sent to Roy months ago before I realized module 
parameters would be an issue. Looking at a swath of various 
/etc/modules.autoload.d/ files, I haven't come up with shell code that 
does the right thing everytime with all the files, which is why I've 
left it up to being a manual process for the user and simply documenting it.
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-24 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-20  5:19 [gentoo-dev] OpenRC & baselayout-2 meets Gentoo Doug Goldstein
2008-03-20  6:59 ` Josh Saddler
2008-03-20 12:12   ` Roy Marples
2008-03-20 14:16     ` Doug Goldstein
2008-03-20 14:34       ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-03-20 20:13 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] " Mike Frysinger
2008-03-24 20:26 ` [gentoo-dev] " Doug Goldstein
2008-03-24 20:35   ` Josh Saddler
2008-03-24 20:47     ` Doug Goldstein
2008-03-24 21:08   ` [gentoo-core] " Mike Frysinger
2008-03-24 21:16     ` Doug Goldstein
2008-03-24 21:32       ` Mike Frysinger
2008-03-24 21:36         ` Doug Goldstein
2008-03-24 21:42           ` Mike Frysinger
2008-03-24 21:53             ` Doug Goldstein [this message]
2008-03-24 22:03               ` Mike Frysinger
2008-03-24 23:49                 ` Doug Goldstein
2008-03-25 12:30                   ` Mike Frysinger
2008-03-25  8:33                 ` Roy Marples
2008-03-25 12:29                   ` Mike Frysinger
2008-03-27 14:57 ` Doug Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47E822BE.3000808@gentoo.org \
    --to=cardoe@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox