From: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC & baselayout-2 meets Gentoo
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:36:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47E81EC6.4020002@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803241732.25169.vapier@gentoo.org>
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 24 March 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday 24 March 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>>
>>>> Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> All,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a formal notice to everyone that OpenRC will be hitting the
>>>>> Gentoo tree sooner rather then later. I would like to see *ALL* arch
>>>>> teams give the current code a whirl on their systems, which is
>>>>> available via the layman module "openrc".
>>>>>
>>>>> I would also like to give the docs team a chance to weigh in here and
>>>>> work with me on a migration guide as well as any necessary updates.
>>>>>
>>>>> That being said, I will be the primary point of contact on the
>>>>> transition to OpenRC appearing in ~arch (along with it's associated
>>>>> baselayout-2.0.0 ebuild). Any and all grievances, concerns,
>>>>> suggestions and comments can and should be routed to me via the
>>>>> associated Bugzilla entries or e-mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not want OpenRC to come as a surprise to anyone and break their
>>>>> system. I expect we will leave no stone unturned and go for a very
>>>>> smooth transition.
>>>>>
>>>>> That being said, the bug for the addition of OpenRC is #212696 [1].
>>>>> The bug for the documentation is #213988 [2].
>>>>>
>>>>> Lastly, I will be out of town March 21st through March 23rd. I will
>>>>> not have IRC access but I will have e-mail and Bugzilla access.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212696
>>>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213988
>>>>>
>>>> It appears my migration plan was not good enough for Mike Frysinger
>>>> <vapier@gentoo.org> and he went ahead and wrote his own version of the
>>>> OpenRC ebuild, differing from the one in the OpenRC layman repo, and
>>>> committed it to the tree this weekend.
>>>>
>>>> Since my offer to work on the migration was not good enough for him, I'm
>>>> backing out and allowing him to handle the whole migration himself since
>>>> I haven't heard from him at all despite Roy (author of OpenRC) and my
>>>> attempts to contact him for 2 weeks regarding a migration plan for
>>>> OpenRC. All issues and comments can be directed to him.
>>>>
>>>> I guess working together and documenting everything before having it hit
>>>> the tree was a bad plan and it had to be one-upped.
>>>>
>>> not sure why you're getting pissy. but let's put some things straight
>>> shall we.
>>>
>>> - the ebuild in question was from the layman repo. i changed things of
>>> course because it didnt cover all upgrade pieces, had obvious style
>>> problems, and did some things wrongly.
>>>
>> You mean it wasn't bash style and instead was functional POSIX shell
>> style.
>>
>
> that wasnt what i was referring to, but converting to the tree standard only
> makes sense for something going into the tree.
>
>
>> And by all upgrade paths would that include adding the bad
>> conversion of /etc/modules.autoload.d/
>>
>
> looks/tested correct to me
>
breaks for anything with a module parameter
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-24 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-20 5:19 [gentoo-dev] OpenRC & baselayout-2 meets Gentoo Doug Goldstein
2008-03-20 6:59 ` Josh Saddler
2008-03-20 12:12 ` Roy Marples
2008-03-20 14:16 ` Doug Goldstein
2008-03-20 14:34 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-03-20 20:13 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] " Mike Frysinger
2008-03-24 20:26 ` [gentoo-dev] " Doug Goldstein
2008-03-24 20:35 ` Josh Saddler
2008-03-24 20:47 ` Doug Goldstein
2008-03-24 21:08 ` [gentoo-core] " Mike Frysinger
2008-03-24 21:16 ` Doug Goldstein
2008-03-24 21:32 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-03-24 21:36 ` Doug Goldstein [this message]
2008-03-24 21:42 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-03-24 21:53 ` Doug Goldstein
2008-03-24 22:03 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-03-24 23:49 ` Doug Goldstein
2008-03-25 12:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-03-25 8:33 ` Roy Marples
2008-03-25 12:29 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-03-27 14:57 ` Doug Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47E81EC6.4020002@gentoo.org \
--to=cardoe@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox