From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JdtOd-0005MJ-W5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:35:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C62A8E003C; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99299E003C; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (ip72-220-186-171.sd.sd.cox.net [72.220.186.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCA466541; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <47E810A4.8070805@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:35:48 -0700 From: Josh Saddler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080306) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Gentoo Core Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC & baselayout-2 meets Gentoo References: <47E1F3C4.5060907@gentoo.org> <47E80E92.5060704@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <47E80E92.5060704@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigED59FB3735444FEAB7F4BEF4" X-Archives-Salt: 53061c68-fd16-480c-86e7-238a88898534 X-Archives-Hash: 852bf97f5cde4a26d99c241d0476cdcc This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigED59FB3735444FEAB7F4BEF4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Doug Goldstein wrote: > It appears my migration plan was not good enough for Mike Frysinger=20 > and he went ahead and wrote his own version of the = > OpenRC ebuild, differing from the one in the OpenRC layman repo, and=20 > committed it to the tree this weekend. >=20 > Since my offer to work on the migration was not good enough for him, I'= m=20 > backing out and allowing him to handle the whole migration himself sinc= e=20 > I haven't heard from him at all despite Roy (author of OpenRC) and my=20 > attempts to contact him for 2 weeks regarding a migration plan for=20 > OpenRC. All issues and comments can be directed to him. >=20 > I guess working together and documenting everything before having it hi= t=20 > the tree was a bad plan and it had to be one-upped. Well, *somebody* had better get their act together and talk with me=20 about the migration document. I don't care about the ebuild so much as I = do about making sure there's a howto for the migration process. If baselayout-2 & OpenRC are the future of Gentoo, then gosh darnit, we=20 need to work together. That means people "in the know" need to=20 communicate with me on the draft (that I've already sent to cardoe),=20 regardless of any who's-ebuild-are-we-using-epenis-fights. :) --------------enigED59FB3735444FEAB7F4BEF4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH6BCn5aFMlhMsVyURAkmuAKDBZIc9V6BXaGJTFcqrpR96kHh6BACglNU2 VxbwbCIUTNFj6EqsuaR8R2I= =rwY1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigED59FB3735444FEAB7F4BEF4-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list