From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JdtG2-0004kE-Cl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:27:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6934E049E; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nameserver1.mcve.com (nameserver1.mcve.com [216.155.111.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFC6E049E; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.55] (shop.monetra.com [216.155.111.10]) by nameserver1.mcve.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7123D120800F; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:26:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <47E80E92.5060704@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:26:58 -0400 From: Doug Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org CC: Gentoo Core Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC & baselayout-2 meets Gentoo References: <47E1F3C4.5060907@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <47E1F3C4.5060907@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 85fdcdce-2097-4669-afff-d91f09a5ed18 X-Archives-Hash: e40fd7ad8c98059cf4ee0d1b045cd912 Doug Goldstein wrote: > All, > > This is a formal notice to everyone that OpenRC will be hitting the > Gentoo tree sooner rather then later. I would like to see *ALL* arch > teams give the current code a whirl on their systems, which is > available via the layman module "openrc". > > I would also like to give the docs team a chance to weigh in here and > work with me on a migration guide as well as any necessary updates. > > That being said, I will be the primary point of contact on the > transition to OpenRC appearing in ~arch (along with it's associated > baselayout-2.0.0 ebuild). Any and all grievances, concerns, > suggestions and comments can and should be routed to me via the > associated Bugzilla entries or e-mail. > > I do not want OpenRC to come as a surprise to anyone and break their > system. I expect we will leave no stone unturned and go for a very > smooth transition. > > That being said, the bug for the addition of OpenRC is #212696 [1]. > The bug for the documentation is #213988 [2]. > > Lastly, I will be out of town March 21st through March 23rd. I will > not have IRC access but I will have e-mail and Bugzilla access. > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212696 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213988 > It appears my migration plan was not good enough for Mike Frysinger and he went ahead and wrote his own version of the OpenRC ebuild, differing from the one in the OpenRC layman repo, and committed it to the tree this weekend. Since my offer to work on the migration was not good enough for him, I'm backing out and allowing him to handle the whole migration himself since I haven't heard from him at all despite Roy (author of OpenRC) and my attempts to contact him for 2 weeks regarding a migration plan for OpenRC. All issues and comments can be directed to him. I guess working together and documenting everything before having it hit the tree was a bad plan and it had to be one-upped. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list