From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jan4r-0002qh-AJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:14:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B473E04C4; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-out2.libero.it (smtp-out2.libero.it [212.52.84.42]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF61E04C4 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay11.libero.it (192.168.32.128) by smtp-out2.libero.it (7.3.120) id 4688F31B197B1935 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 08:14:12 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAGNEvUeXORDG/2dsb2JhbAAIsCI Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.0.6]) ([151.57.16.198]) by outrelay-b11.libero.it with ESMTP; 16 Mar 2008 08:14:12 +0100 Message-ID: <47DCC8A3.9000709@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 08:13:39 +0100 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080228) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Help offered - Portage tree References: <430880c50803121635g294f505av259707f7e6a746bb@mail.gmail.com> <1205415290.17945.19.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org> <1205425423.7261.1.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <47D99234.6030200@gmail.com> <47DA40E7.9020100@gentoo.org> <1205509039.22101.19.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org> In-Reply-To: <1205509039.22101.19.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 61f11215-e658-4574-a3e5-a49d42558f8f X-Archives-Hash: 05a16f51afc637e3da3982fc28460f8f Natanael Copa wrote: > IIRC thread starter complained about too many wrong RDEPEND. No, the thread started with an attitude problem, still unsolved btw. > Problem is not that devs are not willing to fix. Problem is that its to > easy to inject wrong RDEPEND in the tree in the first place and only way > to get it out from there is to wait for someone to report it. Since > many/most devs dont use binpkgs its expected that errors in RDEPEND are > there. That could/will be solved with tinderbox checking or other means of automated checks. We need your help since we don't have enough resources to do that by ourselves. > Might be i have ideas how to fix but I need to gain some experience with > repoman before I present those. Thank you for your offer, I'm looking forward to heard back from you =) lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo Council Member Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list