From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZtiz-0001PM-Fp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:08:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84DF8E081B; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail47.e.nsc.no (mail47.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.47]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B83DE081B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.nor.wtbts.org ([213.234.126.131]) by mail47.nsc.no (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m2DK8L1E018832 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:08:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.nor.wtbts.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nor.wtbts.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A06E1F3A6D for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:08:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.24.78] (unknown [213.234.126.133]) by mail.nor.wtbts.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FA2E1F3A6C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:08:21 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D98A06.3070503@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:09:42 +0100 From: Natanael Copa User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071121) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Help offered - Portage tree References: <430880c50803121635g294f505av259707f7e6a746bb@mail.gmail.com> <1205415290.17945.19.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org> <47D92F32.8070703@gentoo.org> <47D930BC.3050708@gentoo.org> <1205422316.17945.30.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org> <47D95187.2020309@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <47D95187.2020309@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 6a456d7a-714f-4387-92d7-9ab239cd0e7a X-Archives-Hash: bed85056cf9001abb63df3ba68272e04 R=E9mi Cardona wrote: > Natanael Copa a =E9crit : >> But somethimes you just need to accept we don't live in a perfect worl= d. >> I understood early that nobody cares that much about binpkgs anyway an= d >> moved on. > > I'd say you're mistaken. A lot of people care about binpkg. It's not=20 > because a majority of devs don't _use_ them that they are not willing=20 > to fix bugs for other use cases. If it would be practically possible I would still use RDEPEND. It worked=20 alot better to build stuff around NEEDED. > Same thing can be said about other arches or other OSs Gentoo can run o= n. and hardened. > As for the URL you've provided, I don't know what you were trying to=20 > demonstrate because about 3/4th of the bugs were marked as fixed,=20 > showing me that your patches got accepted. :) Which is good... isn't it= ? I wanted to demonstrate that I do submit bugs and very often I submit a=20 patch with it. (so I kinda know what bugs.g.o is) > I, for one, encourage you to keep opening bug reports. Don't worry, I will. > Cheers --=20 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list