From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-29860-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1JZtiz-0001PM-Fp
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:08:25 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84DF8E081B;
	Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:08:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail47.e.nsc.no (mail47.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.47])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B83DE081B
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:08:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.nor.wtbts.org ([213.234.126.131])
	by mail47.nsc.no (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m2DK8L1E018832
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:08:22 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mail.nor.wtbts.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.nor.wtbts.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A06E1F3A6D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:08:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.0.24.78] (unknown [213.234.126.133])
	by mail.nor.wtbts.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FA2E1F3A6C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:08:21 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <47D98A06.3070503@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:09:42 +0100
From: Natanael Copa <natanael.copa@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071121)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Help offered - Portage tree
References: <430880c50803121635g294f505av259707f7e6a746bb@mail.gmail.com>	 <1205415290.17945.19.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org> <47D92F32.8070703@gentoo.org>	 <47D930BC.3050708@gentoo.org> <1205422316.17945.30.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org> <47D95187.2020309@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <47D95187.2020309@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 6a456d7a-714f-4387-92d7-9ab239cd0e7a
X-Archives-Hash: bed85056cf9001abb63df3ba68272e04

R=E9mi Cardona wrote:
> Natanael Copa a =E9crit :
>> But somethimes you just need to accept we don't live in a perfect worl=
d.
>> I understood early that nobody cares that much about binpkgs anyway an=
d
>> moved on.
>
> I'd say you're mistaken. A lot of people care about binpkg. It's not=20
> because a majority of devs don't _use_ them that they are not willing=20
> to fix bugs for other use cases.

If it would be practically possible I would still use RDEPEND. It worked=20
alot better to build stuff around NEEDED.

> Same thing can be said about other arches or other OSs Gentoo can run o=
n.
and hardened.
> As for the URL you've provided, I don't know what you were trying to=20
> demonstrate because about 3/4th of the bugs were marked as fixed,=20
> showing me that your patches got accepted. :) Which is good... isn't it=
?

I wanted to demonstrate that I do submit bugs and very often I submit a=20
patch with it. (so I kinda know what bugs.g.o is)

> I, for one, encourage you to keep opening bug reports.

Don't worry, I will.

> Cheers
--=20
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list