From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWzmQ-0007Tr-WC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:59:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 702A8E0893; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 19:59:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nameserver1.mcve.com (nameserver1.mcve.com [216.155.111.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C8FE0893 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 19:59:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.55] (shop.monetra.com [216.155.111.10]) by nameserver1.mcve.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7901E1110D19 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:59:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <47CEFBBB.3010402@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:59:55 -0500 From: Doug Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March References: <20080301103002.A2AE266A22@smtp.gentoo.org> <200803051324.12812.gentoofan23@gmail.com> <47CEF76C.1010901@gentoo.org> <200803051504.53703.gentoofan23@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200803051504.53703.gentoofan23@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 81ef954f-2570-40c3-92cf-05d1c6b26c04 X-Archives-Hash: f3c95a2cfb7b7c6c6add06127f69fb4c Thomas Anderson wrote: > On Wednesday 05 March 2008 14:41:32 Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > =20 >> Thomas Anderson kirjoitti: >> =20 >>>> Please elaborate on how a "full.fledged developer" would differ from= a >>>> "package maintainer" technically. What requirements and/or >>>> priviledges do you think could be reduced? >>>> >>>> Marius >>>> =20 >>> Perhaps there could be some honor code system at least, where the pac= kage >>> maintainer would be restricted to their area of maintainership. >>> =20 >> This is the current situation. >> >> Regards, >> Petteri >> =20 > > Exactly, only the "package maintainers" wouldn't have everything that a= full=20 > dev would have... > =20 What exactly wouldn't they get? What would differ them from Arch Testers? --=20 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list