From: Richard Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] One request for the next SoC: non already-devs students
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 14:02:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47CAF9D1.6020303@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803021948.56349.bangert@gentoo.org>
Thilo Bangert wrote:
> it's not just what you "sincerely think"! I most certainly think, you have
> a valid point.
>
> from http://code.google.com/soc/2008/faqs.html#0.1_goals:
>
And yet from the same site:
7. Can students working on an open source project continue to work on it
as part of Google Summer of Code?
Yes, as long as they meet all other requirements for program
eligibility. Students should be sure to note their previous relationship
with the project in their applications. New work will need to be done
for the project as part of participation in GSoC.
> Google Summer of Code has several goals:
> - Inspire young developers to begin participating in open source
> development;
Do we inspire them by telling them that anybody who has made this choice
in the past is not to be rewarded financially for doing so?
A bigger concern is this. Which is better for gentoo? Taking somebody
who has never worked on gentoo and paying them money to possibly
accomplish something on the project, or taking somebody who is already
doing quite a bit and pay them so that they can accomplish even more
without the distraction of a day job?
I do think that recruitment is important, but I think it is a bit of a
slap on the face to those who do volunteer to suggest that they're good
enough to work for us but not good enough to pay (when it doesn't even
cost us a dime to do so).
Volunteers work on the stuff they want to work on - SoC isn't so much
about paying people to work on Open Source as much as it is about
enabling people to work on Open Source when otherwise they'd have to do
something else to pay the bills. If somebody doesn't currently want to
volunteer for Gentoo, why would they want to after the paychecks stop?
And if they do currently volunteer for Gentoo, why would we force them
to get involved with some other Open Source project if they wanted to be
paid as part of the SoC?
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-02 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-02 15:47 [gentoo-dev] One request for the next SoC: non already-devs students Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2008-03-02 18:48 ` Thilo Bangert
2008-03-02 19:02 ` Richard Freeman [this message]
2008-03-02 19:25 ` [gentoo-dev] " Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2008-03-02 19:57 ` Wulf C. Krueger
2008-03-02 20:52 ` Brian Harring
2008-03-02 18:57 ` [gentoo-dev] " Robin H. Johnson
2008-03-02 20:37 ` Alec Warner
2008-03-02 20:42 ` Alec Warner
2008-03-02 20:45 ` [gentoo-dev] " Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2008-03-02 22:56 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2008-03-03 0:30 ` Christian Faulhammer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47CAF9D1.6020303@gentoo.org \
--to=rich0@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox