From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JVf76-0007gR-1o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:43:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D8A8E035C; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 03:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from QMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.96]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D30FE035C for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 03:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.36]) by QMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vxwT1Y0080mlR8UA90Jm00; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:43:02 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([76.23.44.115]) by OMTA11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id w3jk1Y0022V5hVo8X00000; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:43:45 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=dpRm06znICIA:10 a=tQPzEDCut5OwYnDi-SYA:9 a=svmKnE1xPwBvqlIJOZXCrv9K-t8A:4 a=C35D7iIojSgA:10 Message-ID: <47CA226F.7000601@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 20:43:43 -0700 From: Steve Dibb User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071118) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March References: <20080301103002.A2AE266A22@smtp.gentoo.org> <47C9360A.9080806@gentoo.org> <200803011429.39223.welp@gentoo.org> <47C96B1F.9000805@gentoo.org> <47C99A1B.7020009@gentoo.org> <20080301194555.29ecad7c@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20080301194555.29ecad7c@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b4b76a08-799a-4650-96fb-adb150f9ed77 X-Archives-Hash: a254b2c2de4a9ffd3a184112188d65f4 Christian Faulhammer wrote: > What we propose is proper testing and keywording by anyone > around...not just team members. I agree... our main problem is manpower -- people actually working on the stable bugs. I've tried to do it myself a few times, but each time it just burns me out to the point where I don't want to (and won't) work on anything Gentoo-related for a time. I've mostly resigned myself to working on just security bugs, but even those are so common that we need people looking at them all the time as well. Anyway, I'm all for a policy of if you have an amd64 box, and you're on a team / herd that wants to move forward with stable plans, just consult the amd64 team and then go ahead with it. Anything to spread the workload so that people don't get fed up with the bottlenecks. Steve -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list