From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JVaWz-0004QZ-D7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 22:50:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DC7CE04CF; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 22:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rex96.flatbooster.net (rex96.flatbooster.net [83.133.189.96]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F67FE04CF for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 22:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [78.42.31.136] (unknown [78.42.31.136]) by rex96.flatbooster.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7EB1273C3F for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 23:50:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47C9DDA1.2000306@bernd-steinhauser.de> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:50:09 +0100 From: Bernd Steinhauser User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080228) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress? References: <47C812CF.2020903@wildgooses.com> <47C82C9F.7040701@gentoo.org> <47C82FB7.9030308@wildgooses.com> <200802291707.17936.roy@marples.name> In-Reply-To: <200802291707.17936.roy@marples.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3400f4f4-8c93-45ba-82e9-89aa0d761489 X-Archives-Hash: 515a81dfc458d0aba7b2ad6f5ba01e23 Roy Marples schrieb: > On Friday 29 February 2008 16:15:51 Ed W wrote: > >> On the other hand since there still isn't a masked ebuild in portage >> (and I seem some notes on my on Roy's site) then I have to assume that >> in fact we are still a good way away from calling it a replacement and >> starting to push it out to users? >> > > It's actually been very stable and usable for a long time. It's not, and never > will be a 100% drop in replacement for everything baselayout provides, but > it's very very compatible. What about the timezone? Baselayout had a setting for the timezone in /etc/conf.d/clock. baselayout-2.0.0 + openrc doesn't seem to have that. Not needed? Bernd -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list