From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JV87w-0000op-JC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:30:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3618E0417; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nameserver1.mcve.com (nameserver1.mcve.com [216.155.111.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BC7E0417 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.55] (shop.monetra.com [216.155.111.10]) by nameserver1.mcve.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F941110D19 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:30:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <47C83321.10801@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:30:25 -0500 From: Doug Klima User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress? References: <47C812CF.2020903@wildgooses.com> <9e0cf0bf0802290616m211b862fr243840dfe0aaea29@mail.gmail.com> <47C82B3C.8090701@wildgooses.com> <47C82C9F.7040701@gentoo.org> <47C82FB7.9030308@wildgooses.com> In-Reply-To: <47C82FB7.9030308@wildgooses.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c7fa4507-ddfd-420a-8ead-286636c25804 X-Archives-Hash: 002718fcdb307689baa59d4c0f7e0af3 Ed W wrote: > Hi > >> baselayout-2 was renamed to openrc when Roy left Gentoo as an >> official dev. > > Answering my own question (for the record). I found some explanation > here: > http://lycos.dropcode.net/gregarius/author.php?author=Roy_Marples__uberlord_ > > >>> Does Roy hang out here? Roy: Is this intended to be a baselayout >>> replacement? How likely is this to be on-track to become a "gentoo >>> official" baselayout? Do you (try to) support busybox and vserver >>> environments? >> Don't know. Yes. Very. Yes & Yes. > > Excellent - this is exciting to hear > > On the other hand since there still isn't a masked ebuild in portage > (and I seem some notes on my on Roy's site) then I have to assume that > in fact we are still a good way away from calling it a replacement and > starting to push it out to users? > > Would it not make sense to start to snapshot some builds and push > openrc out for testing? (Seems like a gentoo job rather than an > upstream is the reason I ask here?) > > Cheers > > Ed W sudo emerge layman sudo layman -L sudo layman -a openrc sudo emerge openrc sudo etc-update -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list