From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JV7h4-0006MS-9j for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:02:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC649E06DC; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nameserver1.mcve.com (nameserver1.mcve.com [216.155.111.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E71E06DC for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.55] (shop.monetra.com [216.155.111.10]) by nameserver1.mcve.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D417A8156 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:02:40 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <47C82C9F.7040701@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:02:39 -0500 From: Doug Klima User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress? References: <47C812CF.2020903@wildgooses.com> <9e0cf0bf0802290616m211b862fr243840dfe0aaea29@mail.gmail.com> <47C82B3C.8090701@wildgooses.com> In-Reply-To: <47C82B3C.8090701@wildgooses.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3ebd9de3-2e12-415f-b8d7-091152ef66df X-Archives-Hash: 393fa11ba26b8ed130838b52ead1ae80 Ed W wrote: > Alon Bar-Lev wrote: >> Check out OpenRC it is baselayout successor and works great! >> > > Funnily enough I came across this earlier today for different > reasons. However, I hadn't realised that it was a full baselayout > competitor? baselayout-2 was renamed to openrc when Roy left Gentoo as an official dev. > > Does Roy hang out here? Roy: Is this intended to be a baselayout > replacement? How likely is this to be on-track to become a "gentoo > official" baselayout? Do you (try to) support busybox and vserver > environments? Don't know. Yes. Very. Yes & Yes. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list