From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JV3Ew-0006Zj-61 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:17:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D715E07A2; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ext.lri.fr (ext.lri.fr [129.175.15.4]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63784E07A2 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ext.lri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08C7A46C4 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:17:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at lri.fr Received: from ext.lri.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext.lri.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7nexDKleFPFK for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:17:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.lri.fr (vhost3-23 [129.175.3.23]) by ext.lri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8927A46AE for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:17:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [129.175.11.52] (lri11-52 [129.175.11.52]) by smtp.lri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55ECE04BA for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:17:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47C7E848.5080009@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:11:04 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?UsOpbWkgQ2FyZG9uYQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080228) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Keyword request interface (SoC candidate?) References: <3c32af40802280933n1290c88bn35b2b989de29ce1b@mail.gmail.com> <47C772B5.9090905@gentoo.org> <1204278247.6288.22.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1204278247.6288.22.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 9de71f34-ba81-4683-9783-e816729e80f2 X-Archives-Hash: ce157e615f5d0e119d079b9cafe20ed4 Peter Volkov a =C3=A9crit : > =D0=92 =D0=A7=D1=82=D0=B2, 28/02/2008 =D0=B2 21:49 -0500, Richard Freem= an =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >> Santiago M. Mola wrote: >>> What do you think about? Would it be easy to integrate it with >>> packages.g.o or should it belong somewhere else? Do you think this is >>> a suitable project for SoC? >> I like the idea, although it is a bit redundant with bugzilla. >=20 > Exactly. It's not convenient when we have stabilization requests in one > place and problems with packages to be stabilized (or even stable on > some archs) reported in another... >=20 > Stealing ideas from the recent discussion of KISS in -security ml[1]: > May be it's better to have such keyword application as an interface to > bugzilla. This separate web/cli/gui program will add/update/search bugs > in bugzilla and e.g. Status Whiteboard field could be used to track > status of the bugs... Also such implementation would move forward KISS > project too. +1 on that idea, using bugzilla with an external tool for keyword=20 requests is a good idea. The tool could do bugzilla research to see if the keyword has already=20 been requested and point the user to the corresponding bug report,=20 hopefully limiting the number of dupes. Cheers, R=C3=A9mi --=20 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list