From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JSJ6V-0001St-Ia for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:37:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30A0EE0471; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044EDE0471 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (ip72-220-186-171.sd.sd.cox.net [72.220.186.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535E365FCF for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <47BDEF08.5080508@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:37:12 -0800 From: Josh Saddler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Keyword amd64 -> x86_64 References: <1203530351.26229.17.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> <20080220192326.1d332d92.genone@gentoo.org> <20080220184023.GA1254@gentoo.org> <20080221160218.bdb1755f.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDDFF28A95CBA3366C1A7E632" X-Archives-Salt: 7e69c1ea-83f7-44f6-9973-b471eb443993 X-Archives-Hash: 69d41f516cde54dd7a295d26d9645374 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDDFF28A95CBA3366C1A7E632 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > Beside, does it really changes stuff for anybody beside Intel fanboys? In fairness, not just for Intel fanboys. Drop by the forums some time and just try to count up all the threads asking "are the amd64 stages/media appropriate for my computer? i have a core 2...." and simila= r. Technically, x86-64 is still correct, but as Marius mentioned earlier, there would have to be a heckuva lot of documentation changes, which wouldn't make the GDP happpy. --------------enigDDFF28A95CBA3366C1A7E632 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHve8L5aFMlhMsVyURAiH1AKCvoOfOKvPkEeI2qYAFkVeE4lF1KACgs/4Q W5JxAUeeMLeFRmjOQkKvFzc= =O1fu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDDFF28A95CBA3366C1A7E632-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list