From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JRFCk-0003Vh-4O for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:15:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BC50E05F8; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmmtao101.cox.net (eastrmmtao101.cox.net [68.230.240.7]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5051FE05F8 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080218231519.OWTO22791.eastrmmtao101.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:15:19 -0500 Received: from [192.168.2.54] ([24.170.195.145]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id rBFB1Y00738hqwQ0000000; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:15:11 -0500 Message-ID: <47BA1186.8090903@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:15:18 -0500 From: Doug Klima User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: flag-o-matic.eclass References: <20080218212052.GC3914@comet.science.oregonstate.edu> <20080218213741.32ddc84f@snowcone> <20080218215434.GD3914@comet.science.oregonstate.edu> <20080218220127.56028c0d@snowcone> <20080218223307.0b2f1e22@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20080218223307.0b2f1e22@snowcone> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3c7edc93-90c4-4850-8286-96d4d13a81d1 X-Archives-Hash: 958179d8b1c98eda113b7da60cce4b80 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:26:11 -0600 > Ryan Hill wrote: >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:34 -0800 >>> Donnie Berkholz wrote: >>>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/bin/isolated-functions.sh?r1=9118&r2=9140 >>>> Alright, so portage has put this stuff to stderr since January 4. >>>> Then why are we also adding workarounds to individual eclasses? >>> How many people are running a Portage version released after >>> January 4? >> Eventually, all of them. > > And until then, how many users are going to get things going weirdly > wrong if workarounds aren't added to everything using the code? > > I'd mutter something about EAPIs here, but really if people are having > difficulty understanding the necessity of the original commit, I > suspect it's a lost cause... > 6 -- Doug Klima http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/ -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list