Re: [gentoo-dev] subversion.eclass

[Doug Klima <cardoe@gentoo.org>]

Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
> Doug Klima schrieb:
>>> 2) ESVN_OFFLINE which disables svn up.
>> Isn't this a bit of a hack? The point is for it to run svn up. Now
>> I've added support in a local refactor that I had started today that
>> if the working copy's revision matches the requested revision, that no
>> svn up is performed. Obviously the situation when you have a "live"
>> SVN ebuild would still result in an svn up, but then again "live" SVN
>> ebuilds are frowned upon and if the person is trying to emerge a
>> "live" SVN ebuild I would expect them to always get the latest version.
> What, if
> - the server containing the repository doesn't respond?
> - there is currently no connection to update but you need to remerge
> because of new useflags added (or similar)?
> In both cases with a normal merge it will die when trying to do svn up.
> Of course with 1) you could hack around
> that and specify the last revision in the repository, which btw. did a
> svn up, too, but this was changed today.
> 
> Regards,
> Bernd

I actually re-evaluated this after I sent that e-mail and changed it to 
behave like cvs.eclass. Basically if you set ESVN_REPO_URI=offline, then 
it'll assume you've got the revision you already want.

-- 
Doug Klima <cardoe@gentoo.org>
http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list