From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JLGs5-0002WF-2T for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 11:49:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42A40E04E5; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:49:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mtai02.charter.net (mtai02.charter.net [209.225.8.182]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B51E04E5 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:49:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aarprv04.charter.net ([10.20.200.74]) by mtai02.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.08.03.00 201-2186-126-20070710) with ESMTP id <20080202114913.XJCQ28707.mtai02.charter.net@aarprv04.charter.net> for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:49:13 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.100] (really [66.215.19.217]) by aarprv04.charter.net with ESMTP id <20080202114913.OYLS17353.aarprv04.charter.net@[192.168.0.100]> for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:49:13 -0500 Message-ID: <47A458B8.9090309@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:49:12 -0800 From: David Shakaryan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071119) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Move SCMs to their own category? References: <41702.192.168.2.159.1201888336.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080201175739.5d2729c7@snowcone> <20080201233433.7b081267.genone@gentoo.org> <99df1af0802011441r5dc490ddn903b6ab312826125@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <99df1af0802011441r5dc490ddn903b6ab312826125@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chzlrs: 0 X-Archives-Salt: f27876ef-d1c0-496e-b5ed-427fa3b71fd6 X-Archives-Hash: 9e0d99947ebaf60a8adf9d94e532db44 Markus Hauschild wrote: > On Feb 1, 2008 11:34 PM, Marius Mauch wrote: >> >> IIRC it was because you argued that cvs didn't qualify >> as a VCS (as the proposed category name back then was app-vcs) >> > > I dont see why cvs is not a vcs like the others but ok. The first sentence on the CVS site[1] begins with "CVS is a version control system". [1] http://www.nongnu.org/cvs/ -- David Shakaryan -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list