From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCsLh-0001nZ-2J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:01:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5CA4E0AD0; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21D1E0AD1 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.19.2] (mail.technosoft.ro [85.186.255.216]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E597064E14 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4785D0BC.8070206@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:01:00 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QWxpbiBOxINzdGFj?= Organization: Gentoo Foundation User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080109) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Of Mips and Devs [Was: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January] References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <47858CAF.8040907@gentoo.org> <200801100134.35669.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200801100134.35669.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7AADEF48F458EB0716E11431" X-Archives-Salt: 4b05959d-9346-4e83-9c06-5826f6e83a6f X-Archives-Hash: 768d506434e08ad3c0f64b5d18b2da27 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7AADEF48F458EB0716E11431 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike Frysinger wrote: >> 3. Should Gentoo even continue to support mips? >> =20 > > i see dropping keywords as a very last resort. getting a port *back* i= nto the=20 > tree is a *tremendous* amount of work (i went through it and it was hel= l),=20 > while keeping ~arch alive is a sliver of effort and generally not a blo= cker=20 > for package maintainers. > =20 How about arm, s390 and sh arches? If I'm not mistaken, you are the only one taking care of these arches and apparently you loosed interest in maintaining them. --------------enig7AADEF48F458EB0716E11431 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkeF0MAACgkQozkEeOnWD03LRACgvbGeDoe5azLSFa7lYccakIJ+ CLEAoIawzA1RQMGylJ58RJR/lM6rUv2A =aL+S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7AADEF48F458EB0716E11431-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list