From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCfB0-0000Zc-P1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:57:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09FC8E05A3; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 17:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from postak-1.fzu.cz (pc175e.fzu.cz [147.231.127.175]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BDDE05A3 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 17:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from postak-3.fzu.cz (postak3.fzu.cz [10.128.1.5]) by postak-1.fzu.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m09Hv2Rv031381 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 18:57:02 +0100 Received: from [10.18.6.23] (nat5.suchdol.net [82.208.33.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by postak-3.fzu.cz (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m09HvBfJ027464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 18:57:12 +0100 Message-ID: <47850AEA.1040600@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:56:58 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Kundr=E1t?= Organization: Gentoo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070812) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <54551.192.168.2.159.1199365359.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <477D75CA.1030003@gentoo.org> <20080104000155.23e056b4@snowcone> <20080104004653.039f488e@snowcone> <20080104012750.63f4f23a@snowcone> <63044.68.54.223.178.1199445791.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080104210213.50a99e6b@snowcone> <61164.68.54.223.178.1199485599.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080104223754.3fb48b85@snowcone> <1199506818.7609.30.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20080105043233.0935d2f8@snowcone> <61307.68.54.223.178.1199541823.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080106003356.46087fef@snowcone> <20080106233412.5875626f@snowcone> <1199829889.8108.12.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> In-Reply-To: <1199829889.8108.12.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF0A04899AE45F8A6B8016B7F" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.9-postak (2007-02-13) on postak1.fzu.cz X-Archives-Salt: 5febd944-88d1-4b0d-9ed2-f51d02b958ce X-Archives-Hash: cf1717a7f259a0007df46981713d67b5 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF0A04899AE45F8A6B8016B7F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Gianelloni wrote: > I have foo 1.0, which is mips. There is foo 2.0, which is stable > everywhere else. The foo 1.0 ebuild does not conform to current ebuild= > standards. I want to commit changes to foo 2.0, and repoman won't allo= w > me due to problems in foo 1.0, but I don't want to WASTE MY TIME on foo= > 1.0, because it's been EOL for 2 years Why don't fix repoman not to scream about such issues, then? Cheers, -jkt --=20 cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth --------------enigF0A04899AE45F8A6B8016B7F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHhQrwamXfqERyJRcRArNnAJ9nQ5rqrDtWV5o2pNt0d1dCnlVssACfZbbS KHVbHrPx9T2KCAdeyeXQoe4= =iYJG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF0A04899AE45F8A6B8016B7F-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list